Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Intel Celeron J6412

Compare Intel Core 4 core CPU vs Intel Celeron J Series 4 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

1362 points
2% slightly better overall score
1329 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

2497 points
2522 points
1% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

1042 points
3% slightly better multitasking score
1005 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

1000 points
3% slightly better heavy workload score
965 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Core 2 Quad Q9550 and the Celeron J6412? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

1048 points
1239 points
18% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score
Geekbench 6 (single) score

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

371 points
438 points
18% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

4
Identical
4

Threads

Number of logical processing units

4
Identical
4

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

2.83 GHz
41% slightly higher clock speed
2.00 GHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

95 W
10 W
850% significantly lower TDP

L2 Cache

Secondary embedded memory, slower than L1 cache

6 MiB
300% significantly more L2 cache
1.5 MiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

850th of 1,089
862nd of 1,089

Family

The product line

Core
Celeron J Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2008 February
2021 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

-
DDR4-3733

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

-
No

Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Celeron J6412 specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the Core 2 Quad Q9550 beats the Celeron J6412 in overall performance. Despite this, the Celeron J6412 has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.

Our spec comparison shows that they have an identical amount of cores and the same number of threads. With our hardware info, we find that the Core 2 Quad Q9550 has a slightly higher clock speed than the Celeron J6412. The Celeron J6412 outputs less heat than Core 2 Quad Q9550 thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. In terms of cache, the Core 2 Quad Q9550 has significantly more L2 cache when compared to the Celeron J6412

Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. For instance, the Core 2 Quad Q9550 has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular CPU Comparisons