Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Intel Core m3-6Y30

Compare Intel Core 4 core CPU vs Intel 6th Generation Core m 2 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

1002 points
63% significantly better overall score
611 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

1852 points
64% significantly better gaming score
1125 points

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

762 points
63% significantly better multitasking score
467 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

730 points
62% significantly better heavy workload score
448 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Core 2 Quad Q6600 and the Core m3-6Y30? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

18.16 points
52% significantly higher Blender score
11.93 points

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

4
100% significantly more cores
2

Threads

Number of logical processing units

4
Identical
4

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

2.40 GHz
58% significantly higher clock speed
1.51 GHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

105 W
5 W
2000% significantly lower TDP

L2 Cache

Secondary embedded memory, slower than L1 cache

8 MiB
1500% significantly more L2 cache
0.5 MiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

946th of 1,089
1,057th of 1,089

Family

The product line

Core
6th Generation Core m

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2007 February
2015 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

-
DDR3-1866

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

-
No

Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Core m3-6Y30 specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Core 2 Quad Q6600 is faster than the Core m3-6Y30. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Core m3-6Y30 in all gaming tests too.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Core 2 Quad Q6600 has significantly more cores than the Core m3-6Y30. Indeed, the Core 2 Quad Q6600 has 4 cores compared to 2 cores found in the Core m3-6Y30. But they both have the same number of threads. With our hardware info, we find that the Core 2 Quad Q6600 has a significantly higher clock speed than the Core m3-6Y30. The Core m3-6Y30 outputs less heat than Core 2 Quad Q6600 thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the Core 2 Quad Q6600 has significantly more L2 cache than the Core m3-6Y30

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. For instance, the Core 2 Quad Q6600 has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular CPU Comparisons