Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel N200

Compare Intel 4 core CPU vs Intel 4 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

1427 points

21% slightly better overall score

1175 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

2707 points

31% slightly better gaming score

2063 points

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

1081 points

16% slightly better multitasking score

930 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

1037 points

14% slightly better heavy workload score

904 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Celeron N5095 and the N200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

14.67 points

84% significantly higher Blender score

7.96 points

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

Identical

Threads

Number of logical processing units

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

831st of 1,089

905th of 1,089

Celeron N5095 vs N200 specs and performance

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Celeron N5095 performs better than the N200. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the N200 in all gaming tests too.

Info from our database shows that they both have the same core count and the same number of threads.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. For instance, the Celeron N5095 has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.