Intel Celeron N4000 vs AMD EPYC 74F3

Celeron N4000 vs EPYC 74F3 benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the EPYC 74F3 beats the Celeron N4000 in overall performance. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Celeron N4000 in all gaming tests too.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the EPYC 74F3 has significantly more cores than the Celeron N4000. Indeed, the EPYC 74F3 has 9 cores compared to 2 cores found in the Celeron N4000. It also has more threads than the Celeron N4000. Our comparison shows that the EPYC 74F3 has a significantly higher clock speed compared to the Celeron N4000. A Celeron N4000 CPU outputs less heat than a EPYC 74F3 CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.

Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. For instance, the Celeron N4000 has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.