Celeron G1610 vs Celeron N4120 specs and performance
In our benchmarks, the Celeron N4120 beats the Celeron G1610 in overall performance. Despite this, the Celeron G1610 has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.
In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Celeron N4120 has significantly more cores than the Celeron G1610. Indeed, the Celeron N4120 has 4 cores compared to 2 cores found in the Celeron G1610. It also has more threads than the Celeron G1610. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the Celeron G1610 has a significantly higher clock speed compared to the Celeron N4120. The Celeron N4120 outputs less heat than Celeron G1610 thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.
Most CPUs have more threads than cores. This technology, colloquially called hyperthreading, improves performance by splitting a core into multiple virtual ones. This provides more efficient utilisation of a core. For instance, the Celeron G1610 has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.