Intel Celeron G1610 vs Intel Celeron N4000

Celeron G1610 vs Celeron N4000 benchmarks

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Celeron G1610 performs better than the Celeron N4000. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Celeron N4000 in all gaming tests too.

When comparing these CPUs we notice that they have the same number of cores and the same number of threads. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the Celeron G1610 has a significantly higher clock speed compared to the Celeron N4000. The Celeron N4000 outputs less heat than Celeron G1610 thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption.

Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. For instance, the Celeron G1610 has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.