Intel Celeron 6305 vs Intel Pentium 4417U

Compare Intel Celeron 6000 Series 2 core CPU vs Intel 2 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

699 points

829 points

18% slightly better overall score

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

1529 points

1604 points

4% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

499 points

623 points

24% slightly better multitasking score

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

478 points

598 points

25% slightly better heavy workload score

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Celeron 6305 and the Pentium 4417U? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

10.52 points

17.80 points

69% significantly higher Blender score

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

Identical

Threads

Number of logical processing units

100% significantly more threads

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

1,058th of 1,118

1,022nd of 1,118

Family

The product line

Celeron 6000 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2020 November

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4-3200

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Celeron 6305 vs Pentium 4417U benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the Pentium 4417U beats the Celeron 6305 in overall performance. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Celeron 6305 in all gaming tests too.

When comparing these CPUs we notice that they have the same number of cores but the Pentium 4417U has more threads.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. For instance, the Celeron 6305 has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.