Athlon 3000G vs Core 2 Quad Q9650 comparison
According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Athlon 3000G is faster than the Core 2 Quad Q9650. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Core 2 Quad Q9650 in all gaming tests too.
With info from our database, we find that the Core 2 Quad Q9650 has significantly more cores with 4 cores whereas the Athlon 3000G has 2 cores. But they both have the same number of threads. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the Athlon 3000G has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Core 2 Quad Q9650. A Athlon 3000G CPU outputs less heat than a Core 2 Quad Q9650 CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the Core 2 Quad Q9650 has significantly more L2 cache than the Athlon 3000G
Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the Athlon 3000G has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.