Intel Arc A350M vs Intel Arc A770

Compare Intel Arc A350M vs Intel Arc A770 16 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1817 points

12582 points

592% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

47 FPS

264 FPS

217 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

32 FPS

193 FPS

162 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

31 FPS

190 FPS

160 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

21 FPS

123 FPS

103 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Arc A350M and the Arc A770? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

377.40 points

2003.09 points

430% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

24875 points

109823 points

341% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

24781 points

95068 points

283% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

300 MHz

Identical

300 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1150 MHz

1650 MHz

43% significantly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

64 Bit

256 Bit

300% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

112 GB/s

384 GB/s

242% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

25 W

380% significantly lower TDP

120 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

27.6 Gigapixels/s

211.2 Gigapixels/s

665% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

55.2 Gigatexels/s

422.4 Gigatexels/s

665% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

1.77 TFLOPS

13.52 TFLOPS

665% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

768

4096

433% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

256

433% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

128

433% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

223rd of 597

30th of 597

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2022 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

Arc A350M vs Arc A770 specs and performance

For gaming, the Arc A770 graphics card is better than the Arc A350M in our tests.

Our database shows that both the Arc A350M and Arc A770 both have the same core clock speed. Despite this, the Arc A770 has a significantly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the Arc A350M has a significantly lower TDP at 25 W when compared to the Arc A770 at 120 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Arc A770 is better than the Arc A350M.