A8-6500 vs FX-9830P benchmarks
According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the FX-9830P is faster than the A8-6500. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the A8-6500 in all gaming tests too.
When comparing core counts for these CPUs, we notice that the FX-9830P has significantly more cores with 4 cores compared to the A8-6500 that has 2 cores. But they both have the same number of threads. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the A8-6500 has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the FX-9830P. In terms of cache, the A8-6500 has significantly more L2 cache when compared to the FX-9830P
Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the A8-6500 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.