AMD A6-3620 vs Intel Celeron N5095A

Compare AMD 4 core CPU vs Intel 4 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

1140 points

1193 points

4% slightly better overall score

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

2097 points

2297 points

9% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

870 points

899 points

3% slightly better multitasking score

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

835 points

863 points

3% slightly better heavy workload score

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the A6-3620 and the Celeron N5095A? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

14.76 points

20.04 points

35% slightly higher Blender score

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

Identical

Threads

Number of logical processing units

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

947th of 1,125

934th of 1,125

A6-3620 vs Celeron N5095A benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the Celeron N5095A beats the A6-3620 in overall performance. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the A6-3620 in all gaming tests too.

When comparing these CPUs we notice that they have the same number of cores and the same number of threads.

Most CPUs have more threads than cores. This technology, colloquially called hyperthreading, improves performance by splitting a core into multiple virtual ones. This provides more efficient utilisation of a core. For instance, the A6-3620 has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.