AMD A6-3620 vs Intel Celeron 6305

Compare AMD 4 core CPU vs Intel Celeron 6000 Series 2 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

1140 points

63% significantly better overall score

699 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

2097 points

37% slightly better gaming score

1529 points

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

870 points

74% significantly better multitasking score

499 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

835 points

74% significantly better heavy workload score

478 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the A6-3620 and the Celeron 6305? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

14.76 points

40% slightly higher Blender score

10.52 points

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

803 points

1220 points

51% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

259 points

730 points

181% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

100% significantly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

100% significantly more threads

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

941st of 1,118

1,058th of 1,118

Family

The product line

Celeron 6000 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2020 November

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4-3200

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

A6-3620 vs Celeron 6305 comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the A6-3620 is faster than the Celeron 6305. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Celeron 6305 in all gaming tests too.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the A6-3620 has significantly more cores than the Celeron 6305. Indeed, the A6-3620 has 4 cores compared to 2 cores found in the Celeron 6305. It also has more threads than the Celeron 6305.

Most CPUs have more threads than cores. This technology, colloquially called hyperthreading, improves performance by splitting a core into multiple virtual ones. This provides more efficient utilisation of a core. For instance, the A6-3620 has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.