NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The average price from our partner retailers

$ 120.11
$ 213.64 significantly less expensive
$ 333.75

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

695 points
2921 points
320% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

13 FPS
61 FPS
48 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

11 FPS
47 FPS
36 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

10 FPS
41 FPS
31 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

10 FPS
36 FPS
27 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K2200 and the GeForce GTX TITAN X? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

125.93 points
545.79 points
333% significantly higher Blender score
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

11549 points
33701 points
191% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

12020 points
39047 points
224% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

11238 points
53345 points
374% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11456 points
41166 points
259% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

10094 points
49052 points
385% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1000 MHz
Identical
1000 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1124 MHz
3% slightly higher boost clock speed
1089 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
384 Bit
200% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

80.19 GB/s
336.6 GB/s
319% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

68 W
267% significantly lower TDP
250 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

17.98 Gigapixels/s
104.5 Gigapixels/s
481% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

44.96 Gigatexels/s
209.1 Gigatexels/s
365% significantly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

640
3072
380% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

40
192
380% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

16
96
499% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

302nd of 604
157th of 604

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 July
2015 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.6

Popular GPU Comparisons