NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The average price from our partner retailers

$ 289.00
$ 120.11
$ 168.89 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2068 points
197% significantly better overall score
695 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

42 FPS
29 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
13 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

33 FPS
23 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
11 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

27 FPS
17 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
10 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

29 FPS
20 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
10 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB and the Quadro K2200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

284.61 points
126% significantly higher Blender score
125.93 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

31922 points
176% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
11549 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

33958 points
182% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
12020 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

33939 points
202% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
11238 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

33375 points
191% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
11456 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

32433 points
221% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
10094 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1506 MHz
50% significantly higher core clock speed
1000 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1708 MHz
51% significantly higher boost clock speed
1124 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit
49% significantly larger memory bus width
128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

192.2 GB/s
139% significantly higher memory bandwidth
80.19 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

120 W
68 W
76% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

81.98 Gigapixels/s
355% significantly higher pixel rate
17.98 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

123 Gigatexels/s
173% significantly higher texture rate
44.96 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1152
79% significantly more shading units
640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

72
79% significantly more texture mapping units
40

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

48
200% significantly more render output processors
16

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

210th of 604
302nd of 604

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 August
2014 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.5

Popular GPU Comparisons